Regulowana
Trwa bonus
Wcześniejsza sprzedaż
- Poziom ryzyka
- Najwyższy
- Ryzyko a zwrot
- Słaby
- Już od
- €1
Link polecający · ryzyko utraty kapitału
Zobacz 1 projekt →
TWINO / Fincard
Polska
Fincard sp. z o.o. issues credit cards in Poland, and TWINO investors buy securities paid only from what it repays. Our memo scores it 50 out of 100 but publishes an E, because two override tests apply, and puts the chance it fails to pay within a year at no less than 25%.
Kluczowe dane
- Już od
- €1
Ryzyko utraty kapitału. Oprocentowanie jest ustalone, ale nie gwarantowane: jeśli pożyczkobiorca nie spłaci zobowiązania, możesz stracić część lub całość swoich pieniędzy.
Czy AI by zainwestowała?
AI 50 ŚredniaNasza AI daje temu projektowi 50 na 100 punktów: Średnia. Jak działa ocena AI
Informacje, a nie osobiste doradztwo inwestycyjne. Ocena AI dotyczy dokumentów publikowanych przez platformę, może być błędna i nie przewiduje zysków.
Analiza AI
AIPlatform memo · TWINO / Fincard · Poland
TWINO: how likely is the company behind your money to fail to pay?
On TWINO you are not lending to TWINO. You buy a security that is paid only if Fincard sp. z o.o. — a Polish credit-card lender in Warsaw, with 56 staff — repays a loan. This memo asks one question: what is the chance that company fails to pay in the next 12 months, and why. Everything else in the chain matters only because it decides who you can turn to if it does not.
THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. This memo was prepared with the help of AI from publicly available documents. It is general information for education only — not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything, and it does not take account of your circumstances. Figures may contain errors; check them against the original documents. Investing through P2P platforms can result in the loss of all money invested.
Our score
50/ 100
E Veto
ABCDE
at least 25%chance it fails to pay in the next 12 months
at least 1 in 4the same number, put the other way round
Where that sits on our scale
Our framework caps this lender at 0% of a portfolio — nothing at all. That is not a forecast about the company's future. It is what our scale does whenever one of the tests that override the score is triggered, and here two are. Poland as a country would allow 15% for all its lenders added together, but the company limit is the one that binds, and here it is zero. These caps are a convention of our scale, applied to every lender we cover. They are not advice about your money.
A very profitable lender whose auditor will not sign off cleanly, whose main fee the regulator calls hidden interest, and which has lent 65% of its owners' money to its owner's other companies
First, what you actually own. Not a loan to TWINO. You own a limited-recourse security issued by SIA TWINO Investments Poland, a Latvian company with €31,400 of assets. Your money buys a claim on a business loan to Fincard. The prospectus is plain: "No collateral, pledge or other types of guarantees will be available for the Securityholders", and you are paid "only from and to the extent of" what Fincard repays. There is no buyback. So the question that matters is Fincard's, and section 0 sets out the chain.
On the six questions Fincard scores 50 out of 100 — a C, about 1 in 17, or 6.0%. It is profitable: it kept 18.66 of every 100 of income in 2025 and made PLN 43.7m, up 29%. Owners' money is 42.5% of what it owns. On the numbers alone it is an ordinary, rather good consumer lender.
Two things in its own audited accounts override that. BDO qualified its opinion on both 2024 and 2025, because no provision was made for a penalty the Polish consumer regulator may impose and the auditor could not estimate it. And at the end of 2025 Fincard had lent PLN 74.8m (€17.7m) to companies in the same ownership — 65% of its owners' money, including PLN 47.6m to its own parent. Each of those is a veto in our method on its own. Together they take the answer to at least 25%.
And behind both sits one fee. PLN 172.9m of Fincard's PLN 228.3m of sales in 2025 — 76% — is a commission charged on the card limit. On 15 June 2026 the regulator said such fees "are in reality hidden capital interest" and announced charges. Those are charges, not a decision, and Fincard says it acted lawfully. But if a year's commission went, PLN 69.5m of profit would become a loss of about PLN 103m — close to all of the owners' money.
Six things would stop us scoring at all and send the answer straight to E — a default, a missed payment to a platform, a regulator pulling a licence, an auditor doubting the company can continue, a broken promise to a lender, or accounts we cannot rely on. Two of them apply, and both are in Fincard’s own audited accounts: the auditor would not sign off cleanly, and more than half the owners’ money is lent to connected companies. Two things would pull the answer the other way, a guarantee from a stronger owner or a credit rating. Neither applies here: nobody guarantees these securities, and the money moves from Fincard up to its owner rather than the other way.
💶Financial strengthC
Keeps 18.66 of every 100; profit PLN 43.7m (€10.4m), up 29%. But 76% of sales is the fee the regulator calls hidden interest.
📉Loan bookD
Bad debts take 36.10 of every 100. Late loans are sold to collectors after 35 days, and no arrears table is published anywhere.
🇵🇱Country: PolandC
Graded C (3.22 out of 5): tight caps on interest and on fees, and a regulator that treats a fee working like interest as interest.
⚖️Group and other risksE
Qualified audits two years running; charges from the consumer regulator; and the group took more than four years to repay investors caught in Russia-linked loans.
What you own is not a loan to TWINO, and nothing is guaranteed.The security is issued by SIA TWINO Investments Poland, a Latvian company holding €31,400 of assets, and is paid only out of what Fincard repays. The prospectus says in terms that no guarantee is available and that the lender "does not provide any kind of guarantee"; any claim for more than what is recovered "shall be extinguished". The one indirect protection is a pledge over Fincard's card loans — and only if that pledge is valid and enforceable under Polish law, which we could not confirm. The older TWINO buyback promise does not apply to these securities.
Two vetoes, both of them in Fincard's own audited accounts.First: BDO qualified its opinion on 2024 and on 2025, because the accounts carry no provision for a possible penalty in the regulator's case and the auditor could not estimate one. An auditor who will not sign off cleanly is a veto in our method. Second: PLN 74.8m (€17.7m) is lent to companies in the same ownership — PLN 47.6m to the parent SIA FINNO Holding, PLN 12.1m to Net Credit and PLN 8.5m to Eliard Holding — which is 65% of the owners' money, against our line of half. It was 69% a year earlier, so this is not a one-off. Either finding alone sets the answer to at least 25%.
The money moves up to the owner, not down to investors.The issuer, the lender, the borrower and the broker all belong to one person. In 2024 Fincard sent PLN 66.3m to related companies and got PLN 32.4m back. The parent group's own filed accounts show equity of €11.3m at the end of 2025 — less than half of Fincard's own €27.4m — so the rest of the group is a drain on Fincard rather than support for it. No guarantee to investors exists anywhere in this group, which is why no uplift applies.
Why this number matters
Every investment carries risk, and risk is not really a letter or a mark out of ten. It is two plain questions: how likely is it that this company fails, and how much of your money would you lose if it did. Put those together and you can see whether the reward is worth it.
For TWINO's Polish securities: the fixed-term securities are offered at 8.5% to 12% a year and FLEXI at 6%. On our reading the chance of the company behind them failing in the next twelve months is at least 25%. If a quarter of lenders like this one fail and about 70% of the money is gone when they do, the risk costs about 17.5% a year — which is more than any of those rates pays. On those numbers nothing is left once the risk is paid for. That is our arithmetic on our own scale, and you are entitled to disagree with the scale; what you should not do is read the rate on its own.
Three things worth holding on to
1. A profitable company can still be the wrong risk
Nothing here says Fincard is about to stop trading. It made PLN 43.7m last year. The question our test asks is different: what would absorb a shock, and is it actually still in the company.
2. One fee carries the whole business
76% of sales is a commission on the card limit, and the regulator has charged that it is interest by another name. The loan losses would not fall if the fee did.
3. There is no buyback and no guarantee
Not from TWINO, not from the issuer, not from the owner. Your claim is limited to what Fincard repays. That is unusual enough to be worth saying twice.
What it is
A licensed payment institutionFincard sp. z o.o., licensed by the Polish regulator KNF since 22 November 2024. Warsaw, 56 staff in 2025. Poland only.
What it sells
Credit cards: NetCredit and HalvoVirtual Mastercard credit lines, for 360 days. Priced as capital interest at the legal maximum plus a separate commission on the limit granted.
How big
€41.7m of card loansPLN 176.0m net at the end of 2025. Sales of PLN 228.3m, against PLN 192.5m in 2024.
Who owns it
SIA FINNO Holding (Latvia)Owned by Armands Broks, who also owns TWINO. The issuer, the lender, the borrower and the broker are all his.
Platform
TWINO (twino.eu)AS TWINO Investments, a Latvian investment firm licensed by the Bank of Latvia since 31 August 2021. It sells the securities and holds them for you off its own balance sheet.
How much is at stake
€38.8mOn TWINO on 13 September 2026, on the platform's own figure. AS TWINO Investments held €34.4m of these securities for clients at the end of 2025.
Rate and protection
8.5%–12% / 6%, no buybackFixed-term securities and FLEXI, which has been 6% since April 2026. Limited recourse: there is no buyback and no guarantee from anyone. Rates read on twino.eu on 5 November 2026.
What stands behind it
A pledge, if it is validThe loan to Fincard is to be secured on its card loans, capped at 95% of that book and standing at 66% at the end of 2025. Whether the pledge is registered and enforceable in Poland, we could not confirm.
Pełna analiza obejmuje pożyczkobiorcę lub spółkę, zabezpieczenie, przepływy pieniężne, ryzyka i werdykt. Zaloguj się, aby ją przeczytać.
Informacje, a nie osobiste doradztwo inwestycyjne. Ocena AI dotyczy dokumentów publikowanych przez platformę, może być błędna i nie przewiduje zysków.
Zapytaj AI o ten projekt
Zaloguj się, aby zapytać AI o dokumenty tego projektu.
Zaloguj sięPodoba Ci się ten projekt?
👍 Tak · 0 👎 Nie · 0
Komentarze · 0
- Brak komentarzy.
Platforma i podobne projekty
Dostępny na platformie
Podobne otwarte projekty
Placet Group
Mintos
- Średnie oprocentowanie
- 9.22%
- średnia, niegwarantowana
- Portfel pożyczek
- €1m
Od €50
Zobacz projekt
ESTO AS
Mintos
- Średnie oprocentowanie
- 7.21%
- średnia, niegwarantowana
- Portfel pożyczek
- €34.8m
Od €50
Zobacz projekt
ID Finance Spain
Mintos
- Średnie oprocentowanie
- 9.86%
- średnia, niegwarantowana
- Portfel pożyczek
- €22.3m
Od €50
Zobacz projekt