Crowdlending in France: the platforms compared
Crowdlending in France: 8 AMF-licensed lending platforms compared on minimum, stated rate, security, late loans and how the interest is taxed in 2026.
- Investing in Loans
- Investing in SME Loans
Questions about investing? Ask the AI guide.
Hi! I'm the Crowdinform AI guide.
Sign in free to ask the AI guide about platforms, projects and your plans.
Answers come from Crowdinform's checked data. Information, not personal investment advice.
Looking it up… Something went wrong. Please try again. {n} questions left today
Property · France · since 2014
Reviewed by Eugene Sokolovs, figures checked 2 Nov 2026
French property crowdfunding platform since 2014: bonds for property developers from €1,000, 10.59% average contractual rate and €1.93 billion lent, AMF-authorised, but about 36% of money lent is late, rescheduled or in proceedings.
Capital at risk. Past returns do not predict future returns; a borrower can pay late or not at all.
Higher means more risk. Money finally lost is 0.12% of all lending, which on its own would be the lowest level. We moved it one step worse because about 36% of money lent is late, rescheduled or in proceedings, the headline return counts only settled deals and the loss figure has been restated. With 19.69% in default, losses could end up higher. The high default share points to weak checks of borrowers' cash flow; the low final loss, with about 79% of capital recovered on failed projects, shows that the security has been valued and recovered well.
The bonds carry 10.59% a year on average across all projects since 2015 (as of 19 October 2026). It is a contractual rate; no return after late and failed loans is published.
A high contractual rate set against low losses booked so far. This holds only if the property security brings the money back on the many projects now in proceedings.
Capital at risk. Past returns do not predict future returns; a borrower can pay late or not at all.
ClubFunding is a French property crowdfunding platform run by CLUBFUNDING SAS in Paris, founded in November 2014. It sells private investors short-term bonds issued by companies that French property developers and property traders set up for each project. It is one of the largest platforms of its kind in France: €1,930.6 million has been lent through it since May 2015 (as of 19 October 2026).
You choose projects one by one, from €1,000 per project. Each project is a bond with a fixed interest rate, usually paid monthly, and the capital is paid back in one sum at the end. Terms are typically one to three years. There is no automatic investing.
The interest rates written into the bonds average 10.59% a year across everything lent since 2015, weighted by amount (as of 19 October 2026). Rates have risen over time: 9.25% for 2015 projects, 12.50% for 2025 and 12.54% for 2026. This is the agreed rate, not what investors actually earned: ClubFunding publishes no return after late and failed loans. The home page shows 9.95% a year, but its own footnote says this counts only financings fully settled since 2015, so it leaves out every loan still running, late or in proceedings. In total, €258.5 million of interest has been paid to investors since 2015.
Money finally lost is still small: €2.3 million on 11 projects, about 0.12% of all money lent (as of 19 October 2026, calculated from the platform's own figures). This figure has been restated: in April 2026 the same page showed €1.6 million on 4 projects.
Many loans are in trouble, though. Following the French industry standard, €380.2 million (19.69% of all money lent, 226 projects) is in default: more than six months late (€58.7 million), in a negotiated rescue procedure (€62.6 million) or in court insolvency proceedings (€258.9 million). A further €94.5 million is up to six months late, and €222.3 million is being repaid on schedules changed by agreement, which the platform does not count as late. Together, about 36% of all money ever lent is late, rescheduled or in proceedings. Of the €879.2 million still outstanding, only €182.2 million is paying on its original schedule. Projects funded in 2022 and 2023 have done worst, with about 31% and 28% of their money in default. Losses are booked only when proceedings end, so the loss figure could rise.
How we read these figures: so much money in default points to weak checks of whether each project's cash flow can repay the loan on time. The low final loss, with about 79% of capital recovered on the 11 projects that ended with a loss, shows that the property security has been valued well and recovered.
Each project carries its own security: usually a registered mortgage on the property or a trust arrangement over it, a pledge of the borrowing company's shares, and an on-demand guarantee from the developer. There is no buyback, no reserve fund and no insurance. Projects are chosen by an internal committee after site visits; the platform publishes no rule for independent valuations or for how large a loan may be against the property's value. On the 11 projects that ended with a loss, about 79% of the capital came back (calculated from the platform's own figures); no recovery figure is published for the many projects still in proceedings. ClubFunding companies have themselves put in 19.76% of all money lent since 2015. In practice, your protection is the security on each project, and with about one euro in five in default, it has not yet been tested at scale.
CLUBFUNDING SAS (company number 807 764 980, Paris) is authorised by France's financial markets regulator, the AMF, as a European crowdfunding service provider, number FP-2023-40, since 24 November 2023. Its older French crowdfunding registration was removed on 6 March 2026 as part of the move to the European licence. No fine or regulator action against the platform was found.
Investors pay no fees to open an account, invest, hold or withdraw money, according to the platform's terms. Developers pay the platform a commission on what they raise, which is an indirect cost because the project has to earn it back.
You get your money back only when the bond is repaid. There is no working market to sell bonds to other investors. Many repayments come late: on four projects of the developer DMVIP, which entered a court safeguard procedure in August 2023, investors were told in January 2026 that a ten-year repayment plan would start only after the properties are sold. Plan for your money to be tied up for the full term, and possibly much longer.
Return: High — the bonds carry 10.59% a year on average, a contractual rate rather than a measured result. Risk: Low (higher means more risk) — the money finally lost is only 0.12% of all lending, but we moved the level one step worse because about 36% of the money lent is late, rescheduled or in proceedings, the headline return counts only settled deals and the loss figure has been restated; with 19.69% in default, losses could end up higher. The high share in default points to weak checks of projects' cash flow, while the low final loss shows the property security has been valued and recovered well. Risk-return: High — a high contractual rate against low losses so far, as long as the security holds up in the proceedings now under way.
Crowdlending in France: 8 AMF-licensed lending platforms compared on minimum, stated rate, security, late loans and how the interest is taxed in 2026.
Yes. France's financial markets regulator, the AMF, authorised CLUBFUNDING SAS as a European crowdfunding service provider on 24 November 2023, number FP-2023-40. No fine or regulator action against the platform was found.
Treezor SAS, an electronic money institution authorised in France. While a project is raising money, your payment sits in a dedicated account in the name of the company issuing the bonds; if the raise falls short, it is refunded within 72 business hours.
€1,000 per project.
The bonds carry 10.59% a year on average since 2015, a contractual rate. Money finally lost is €2.3 million on 11 projects, 0.12% of all lending, but €380.2 million (19.69%) is in default and about 36% of all money lent is late, rescheduled or in proceedings (as of 19 October 2026). Losses are booked only when proceedings end.
Each project usually has a registered mortgage or a trust over the property, a pledge of the borrower's shares and an on-demand guarantee from the developer. There is no buyback, reserve fund or insurance, and no published rule on independent valuations. On the 11 projects closed with a loss, about 79% of the capital came back.
No. There is no working market to sell to other investors, so your money comes back only when the bond is repaid. Many projects repay late, sometimes years late.
None as an investor: opening an account, investing, holding and withdrawing money are free. Developers pay the platform a commission on what they raise.
The bonds are owed by each project company, not by ClubFunding, and money waiting in your account is held at Treezor, not on ClubFunding's books. If a developer fails, the platform negotiates or goes to court and then enforces the security, which can take years and may return less than you put in. No compensation scheme covers these bonds.
The 9.95% counts only financings fully settled since 2015, so it leaves out every loan still running, late or in proceedings. The 10.59% is the average rate agreed in the bonds across all projects. Neither shows what investors earned after losses.
No reviews with this rating yet.
An investor Sign in to vote on reviews Something went wrong. Please try again. Read more