SeedBlink is a European equity crowdfunding and investment platform connecting retail investors with tech startups. Founded in Romania in 2020, it has since evolved into an all-in-one equity management and funding ecosystem serving Europe. The platform’s model allows individuals to co-invest alongside venture capital funds and angels, giving retail investors access to curated startup deals typically backed by institutional lead investors. Key advantages include a low minimum ticket (~€2,500) and a structured syndication process that pools many small investments into one vehicle on the startup’s cap table. This approach offers investors diversified exposure to high-growth tech companies, with SeedBlink handling administration and providing portfolio tracking tools. Major risks to note are the high failure rate of startups, illiquidity (investments are long-term with no guaranteed exit), and the possibility of total loss of capital – startup equity is high risk, with no guarantee of returns. SeedBlink emphasizes these risks clearly and only accepts a small percentage of applicants, focusing on quality over quantity. ⚠️ In summary, SeedBlink democratizes startup investing by offering professional-grade deal access to retail investors, but it comes with high risk and very limited liquidity, meaning investors should allocate only a small portion of their portfolio and be prepared to hold investments for several years (or potentially lose them).
Investment Type: SeedBlink primarily offers equity investments in private tech startups and scale-ups (from pre-seed up to Series B stages). Investors purchase shares (equity stakes) in these companies, either via new share issuances during funding rounds or via SeedBlink’s secondary market (resales of existing shares). The platform also supports convertible instruments (e.g. convertible notes or SAFE agreements) for early-stage deals, which convert into equity in a future round.
How It Works & Returns: Each published deal on SeedBlink is typically led by a professional investor (VC or angel) who commits capital upfront, with SeedBlink’s community filling the remaining round. Investors review detailed pitch materials, business plans, and terms on the platform and commit funds, which are collected once the round closes. Returns for investors are realized only if the startup exits (via an acquisition or IPO) or if shares are sold on the secondary market. There are no regular dividends or interest – the payoff is usually a one-time capital gain if the startup grows and is sold at a higher valuation. Notably, exits can take 5–10 years (if they happen at all), and many startups may fail with no returns. SeedBlink recorded its first exit in mid-2022 when MedTech startup SanoPass was acquired ~2.5 years after funding, allowing SeedBlink investors to cash out at a profit. Some investors have also achieved partial exits via the secondary bulletin board, with a few early sales yielding 2.5–3× returns in about two years (by selling shares to other investors before an official exit). However, such outcomes are the exception – most investments remain illiquid for years, and returns are highly uncertain.
Legal & Structural Setup: SeedBlink uses a nominee structure (via SeedBlink Trust GmbH in Austria) to hold shares on behalf of investors. This means all individual investors in a deal are consolidated under a single legal shareholder (the SeedBlink nominee), simplifying the startup’s cap table. Previously, the platform used SPVs, but it transitioned to the nominee model in 2022 to speed up execution and reduce costs for investors. Investors retain beneficial ownership of the shares and their rights (economic rights, voting instructions, etc.), while SeedBlink (through the nominee entity) handles governance and paperwork. This structure streamlines follow-on funding and exits, as the nominee can sign on behalf of all investors. Each investment comes with legal contracts (subscription agreements or convertible loan agreements) and investors typically must hold until a liquidity event, unless they sell on the platform’s secondary market.
Geographic & Sector Focus: SeedBlink started with a focus on Romanian and Central-East European startups, but it now has a pan-European mandate. It has funded companies from 15 countries so far (including Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Netherlands, etc.), and opened offices in Bucharest, Sofia, Athens, Brussels/Benelux, Vienna (for DACH), and Dublin to support regional deal flow. The sector focus is broad within tech – top funded verticals include Enterprise SaaS, AI/ML, FinTech, Marketplaces, MedTech among others. In 2023, Enterprise software and AI deals dominated by amount raised (e.g. €67M mobilized in Enterprise SaaS, €55M in AI/ML as of 2023). SeedBlink also occasionally lists “Community Stars” deals – very early-stage startups from their community – but generally prioritizes ventures that have some traction and VC backing. There are no explicit sector exclusions, but most opportunities are in innovation-driven businesses (tech, digital, biotech, etc.) rather than traditional brick-and-mortar projects.
Investment Terms & Metrics: Typical equity rounds on SeedBlink have a target raise between €50K and €2M (SeedBlink’s portion), often as part of larger rounds. Investors can usually invest as little as €2,500 per deal (sometimes even €1,000 for members who invest €10K+ per year). There is no explicit maximum per investor per deal (aside from the round size). Expected returns are not guaranteed; however, startups often pitch potential multiples (5×, 10×, etc.) over 5–7 years if successful. In reality, outcomes vary: some could yield high multiples or an IPO, while many may return 0. Maturities are not fixed – equity has no maturity date, and investors remain shareholders until they sell or the company exits. For convertibles, typical maturity might be 12–24 months for conversion triggers, but if no trigger event, they may convert at a default valuation or repay (details vary per deal). Investors should be prepared to have their money locked in for several years. SeedBlink launched a secondary market in 2023 to improve liquidity, but selling shares still depends on finding buyers and is only available for certain companies (so far, ~45 portfolio companies were enabled on the bulletin board).
Major Risk Points: Investing on SeedBlink carries all the risks of startup investing. The default risk (startup failure risk) is high – if a funded startup goes bankrupt or shuts down, investors likely lose their entire investment (this has occurred in some cases, as expected in a startup portfolio, though these failures often go unpublicized). Illiquidity is a significant risk: there is no guarantee of any secondary market buyer, and no right to redemption – investors must wait for an exit which may never occur. Even with the secondary market, only €3.7M of transactions had occurred as of Oct 2024 (across all investors), a tiny fraction of total investment volume, underscoring that selling early is difficult. Dilution risk is also present – if the startup raises additional funding, new shares may dilute earlier investors; SeedBlink investors typically do not have guaranteed pro-rata rights (though some deals might offer the option), so future rounds can reduce one’s ownership percentage. Valuation risk is notable: early-stage valuations can be high and might not materialize into corresponding exits, leading to poor or negative returns. Additionally, no investor protection scheme applies – these are not insured deposits or bonds. The Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority explicitly warns that crowdfunding investors are not covered by compensation funds if the platform or project fails. Finally, platform risk should be mentioned: while SeedBlink is regulated (see below) and uses a nominee structure, extreme scenarios like the platform’s insolvency or technical failures could complicate investment management (though holdings would still be valid via the nominee). Overall, investors should consider SeedBlink high-risk, high-reward and invest only money they can afford to tie up long-term and potentially lose entirely.
Founders and Ownership: SeedBlink was founded in early 2020 by a team of four Romanian entrepreneurs and finance professionals. Key founders include Andrei Dudoiu (former banker, now SeedBlink’s Board President), Ionuț Pătrăhău, Rareș (Radu) Georgescu, and Marius Ghenea. Carmen Sebe (former CEO of GECAD Ventures) joined early and is President of the Board, later becoming CEO in 2023. These individuals are well-known in the Romanian tech scene: Radu Georgescu and Marius Ghenea are prominent tech investors, which gave SeedBlink credibility at launch. The company has raised venture funding for itself as well – it closed a €3 million Series A in 2021, which notably included €1.1M crowdfunded from its own platform (the largest such round in Romania at that time). Subsequent financing included investments from Catalyst Romania VC and other backers (Catalyst Romania Fund II put in €1.2M in 2020). SeedBlink was reportedly at “Series B” stage by 2023 in terms of funding status, though details on a Series B round are not public. The current ownership includes the founders, early VC investors, and possibly some crowd shareholders from the 2021 round.
Management Team: As of 2024, Carmen Sebe is the CEO of SeedBlink, bringing extensive fintech executive experience. Andrei Dudoiu, who was co-founder and initial CEO, now serves as President of the Board of Directors and is actively involved in strategic direction. Radu Georgescu is Chairman of the Board, and Marius Ghenea is also on the Board. The management team spans multiple countries: for example, Angel Hadjiev is Regional Manager for SEE (Southeast Europe), Ronald Rapberger is Head of Sales focusing on DACH expansion, George Simion is CTO, and Bogdan Stoian is Head of Operations. This reflects SeedBlink’s drive to grow beyond Romania. The company also has advisory board members like Pekka Mäki (VC executive) and Ted Cominos Jr. (lawyer).
Partners and Backers: SeedBlink often co-invests with top-tier venture capital funds as partners. They have a network of VC partners across Europe – many campaigns on the platform are in collaboration with VCs that lead the round. For instance, SeedBlink highlights partnerships with funds and angel networks to source deals and provide due diligence. In terms of corporate partners, in 2023 SeedBlink acquired Symbid (a Dutch crowdfunding pioneer), marking a strategic partnership/expansion into the Benelux market. The platform has also partnered with service providers like Equidam for valuation tools and others to support startups in its portfolio. Another example is a partnership with Venture University (USA) to provide investor education in Europe. SeedBlink’s backers include the above-mentioned VCs and likely some angels; it is often cited as a fast-growing European fintech with institutional support. Notably, BT Capital (part of Banca Transilvania Financial Group) is an investor – BT Asset Management representatives have used the platform, and Banca Transilvania was a listed partner on StartupCafe’s content, indicating support.
Legal Structure and Subsidiaries: The operating company is SeedBlink S.A., a Romanian joint-stock company (Societate pe Acțiuni) registered in Bucharest. The company was initially known as SeedBlink Crowd S.A. during the licensing process. It now has subsidiaries or sister entities in other countries: SeedBlink Limited in Ireland (likely for EU operations and passporting), and SeedBlink Trust GmbH in Austria (the nominee vehicle holding investor shares). Additionally, local offices (non-incorporated branches or subsidiaries) exist in Bulgaria, Greece, the Netherlands/Belgium (via Symbid), and Austria. The company’s headquarters remains in Bucharest, Romania (Floreasca Park). SeedBlink also launched “Nimity”, which is branded as an equity management software platform (for cap table and ESOP management) – Nimity may be structured as a product line or separate unit, possibly originating from an acquisition or internal development in 2023.
Regulation and Licenses: SeedBlink is a regulated crowdfunding service provider. It was the first platform authorized under Romania’s crowdfunding law (which implemented EU Regulation 2020/1503). The Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF) authorized SeedBlink on November 3, 2022 as a provider of participative financing services. Its license number is PJR28FSFPR/400001 and it is passported across the EU via the ESMA register. This means SeedBlink can legally serve investors and issuers throughout all EU member states. The ASF authorization allows SeedBlink to (1) facilitate the placement of securities and crowdfunding instruments without firm commitment, (2) operate a bulletin board (secondary market), and (3) use special purpose vehicles (though now they use a nominee structure). Supervisory Authorities: In Romania, ASF oversees its compliance; as an EU-passported platform, it’s also listed by ESMA and can be subject to oversight in any host country if needed. There have been no regulatory sanctions or warnings against SeedBlink reported as of 2025. The platform conforms to the new European Crowdfunding Regulation, providing required Key Investment Information Sheets (KIIS) for each campaign and conducting investor appropriateness tests (a suitability questionnaire) as required. SeedBlink’s regulatory status and compliance measures aim to ensure a safe investing environment, though investors are still exposed to significant risks inherent to startups.
Funding Volume and Growth: Since its launch in 2020, SeedBlink has experienced rapid growth in activity. Over the four years up to the end of 2023, the platform facilitated startup investments totaling €342 million (this figure represents the total capital mobilized for rounds that SeedBlink participated in, including lead investors). Out of that, €67 million was contributed directly by SeedBlink’s community of investors (i.e. the amount invested through the platform by retail and angel users). The difference indicates that SeedBlink typically covers ~20% of each round alongside larger investors. The number of deals funded has surpassed 250 companies from 15 countries in 4 years. The platform’s yearly activity peaked in 2023, which was its most active year with 53 deals closed (despite a general VC market slowdown). By January 2024, SeedBlink reported it had built a network of 4,500+ stakeholder companies and 112,000+ equity stakeholders (including founders, employees, and investors) on its platform, with €15+ billion in assets tracked (likely the combined valuation of all companies on the platform). This highlights the addition of its equity management product (Nimity) which significantly broadened its user base of stakeholders.
Investor Community Size: The investor base grew from around 9,000 investors in early 2022 to approximately 12,000–13,000 active investors by mid-2025. (“Active” meaning those who have invested in at least one campaign – there are over 112k registered user accounts, but most have not invested yet.) These investors come from over 50 countries, though the majority are in Europe. The average investment ticket on SeedBlink is around €5,600 as of 2023, up from ~€4,000 average in 2021. The minimum ticket per campaign is typically €2,500 (or €1,000 for certain cases as noted), which has allowed a broad base of retail investors to participate. The largest single investment by an individual so far was €500,000 in one campaign. Investor portfolio stats: The largest individual portfolio on SeedBlink (i.e. one user’s cumulative investments) is valued over €900,000 spread across 49 investments. About 25% of investors on the platform have built portfolios of 5 or more startups, indicating a segment of repeat investors who diversify. Impressively, nearly half of the active investors (47.5%) have made more than one investment (repeat investors), showing strong engagement from the community.
Project Successes and Failures: As of late 2023, SeedBlink has had at least one profitable exit – the acquisition of SanoPass (a Romanian healthtech startup) by MedLife, which gave SeedBlink investors an exit after 2.5 years. Investors reportedly earned a positive return (though the exact multiple was not disclosed, one investor called it “lower than I dreamed, but an excellent return”). Additionally, some startups funded on SeedBlink have gone on to raise larger follow-on rounds at higher valuations (e.g. FlowX.ai, Dronamics) – creating unrealized gains for initial investors. For example, FlowX.ai’s SeedBlink investors saw the company’s valuation grow significantly after it raised a €7.3M round (SeedBlink contributed €1.6M of that in 2021). Another example, Dronamics (drone delivery startup) raised a Series A where SeedBlink investors contributed €950K; that company has since achieved milestones and a higher profile. However, it’s important to note that some funded startups have likely struggled or shut down. SeedBlink’s 2022 report mentioned reviewing 1,500+ funding applications and selecting only 56 by 2022, implying strict selection. Of those funded, defaults/failures are not formally reported yet, but industry norms suggest some will fail. No official default or loss rate has been published as of 2025, likely because the portfolio is still young (many companies are still operating). Investors should assume a portion of startups will fail (potentially 20–30% within a few years, as suggested by general startup statistics). Overdue loans are not applicable since SeedBlink doesn’t do loans, but delays in exits are expected (exits can take longer than initially forecast).
Returns to Investors: Since the platform is only 5 years old, realized returns are limited. The average IRR or ROI is not disclosed, as most investments are still in play. We do know that several investors realized 2–3x returns by selling shares on the secondary market within 1–2 years for a few high-performing startups. The SanoPass exit likely delivered a modest multiple (perhaps ~1.5–2x given comments) – still a win given the short horizon. On the other hand, a few companies might have been marked down or written off (which would imply -100% loss on those positions). No investor has hit a “unicorn” exit yet via SeedBlink, as most companies are still growing. The platform’s promise is high potential (some startups aim for 5–10x exits), but any average returns will only materialize over a longer period as more exits occur. It’s worth noting that SeedBlink itself offered an investment opportunity to its users in 2021 and those who bought in at that time have a stake in SeedBlink’s own growth (though no liquidity event for SeedBlink has occurred yet).
In summary, by the start of 2024 SeedBlink had mobilized €342M across 250+ deals, with €67M invested by the crowd. It built a community of 12k+ active investors and demonstrated a few early successes (one full exit and a growing secondary market). While defaults are not public, investors should expect that not all 250 companies will succeed – the true portfolio performance will become clearer over the next 5–10 years as more startups either exit or fail. The early indicators (repeat investment rate, follow-on funding of portfolio companies, etc.) are positive and suggest that SeedBlink’s model is delivering strong deal flow and investor engagement. The 2023 activity (53 deals) despite market headwinds shows the platform’s momentum, and SeedBlink anticipated a rebound in tech startup growth and more exits in 2024–2025. Investors, however, should measure success on a portfolio basis – expecting a few big wins, several moderate outcomes, and many losses.
Project Selection & Due Diligence: SeedBlink employs a highly selective vetting process for listing startups. Out of thousands of applications, only a few percent make it onto the platform. The team reviews each startup’s business model, traction, financials, and growth plans. A key criterion is that each campaign must have a lead investor (institutional or well-known angel) already committed. This means by the time it’s on SeedBlink, a venture capital fund or professional investor has done due diligence and agreed to invest, which de-risks the opportunity for crowd investors to some extent. SeedBlink leverages these lead investors’ expertise – essentially co-investing alongside VCs is a built-in risk mitigation. The platform also focuses on VC-backed rounds and syndicate deals; in 2023 it even introduced distinct deal categories like “VC Lead” rounds vs. “Community Stars” (the latter being smaller, early deals often championed by SeedBlink’s own network). Internally, SeedBlink likely has an investment committee that performs due diligence on each startup (reviewing documents, market, team background, etc.), though detailed internal processes aren’t public. However, the low acceptance rate and presence of top-tier VCs (e.g., campaigns have included startups backed by GapMinder, Earlybird, etc.) indicates a rigorous selection. Common reasons for rejecting startups include insufficient traction, unrealistic valuation, or not meeting growth criteria (as noted in a 2022 report).
Risk Scoring/Rating: Unlike loan crowdfunding, SeedBlink does not assign a numeric “risk score” to equity deals. All startups are understood to be high-risk investments by default. Instead of ratings, the platform provides extensive information disclosure: each campaign comes with a Key Investment Information Sheet (KIIS) that outlines risks, and detailed pitch decks and financials for investor analysis. There is also a discussion forum/Q&A per deal where investors can ask questions directly to founders, helping clarify risks. SeedBlink emphasizes investor education – for example, it has a Funding Academy and webinars on portfolio strategy and the “power law” of startup investing, to make sure investors understand that only a few investments may drive most returns. The platform’s philosophy is to encourage diversification: they often note that investors should build a portfolio of many startups (at least 5–10) to improve odds of a winner, given the high-risk nature of each (this advice is echoed in their content). New investors on SeedBlink are required to take a suitability questionnaire to assess their understanding of startup risks, and if someone is inexperienced, the platform recommends starting with the minimum ticket and cautions them not to over-allocate to this asset class. This practice is in line with regulatory requirements and demonstrates SeedBlink’s commitment to responsible investing.
Sector/Geographic Risk Management: SeedBlink doesn’t impose hard limits on sectors or countries, but it naturally diversifies across tech verticals and geographies. As noted, in 2023 the top five verticals by amount were SaaS, AI, FinTech, Marketplace, MedTech, indicating no single sector dominance. Geographically, while rooted in CEE, deals now come from Western Europe as well. This spread reduces concentration risk. Moreover, the platform often syndicates with local lead investors who know their market, managing the regional risk through local expertise. If a project is outside SeedBlink’s core expertise, presumably they rely on the lead investor’s insight.
Investor Risk Mitigation Tools: To manage risk for investors, SeedBlink has introduced features like the “Thesis Definition” tool (planned) to help investors set their investment preferences and receive suitable deal matches. This ensures investors focus on deals that match their risk appetite and knowledge. The platform also provides regular reporting from startups – founders must upload quarterly updates and financial reports, which are shared with investors via the “My Portfolio” dashboard. This transparency allows investors to monitor progress and flag issues early. For downside protection, there is no insurance or guarantee on the investments (common in equity crowdfunding, no such insurance exists). However, the terms often include protective provisions standard in VC deals (like drag-along, tag-along rights, liquidation preferences if any) which protect investors from certain adverse outcomes relative to founders. SeedBlink ensures these terms are communicated; for instance, they publish the shareholder agreements or term sheets for each round so investors know their rights (e.g., if it’s ordinary equity or preferred shares, etc.). In convertible note deals, terms like discount, valuation cap, and interest (if any) are clearly stated, so investors can gauge the risk-reward.
Monitoring and Follow-up: After funding, SeedBlink’s operations team keeps in touch with portfolio companies. They facilitate the flow of information and enforce any reporting commitments. Some startups have SeedBlink or its nominee as a shareholder on cap tables, meaning the platform gets shareholder notices and passes them to investors. When follow-on rounds occur, SeedBlink often negotiates pro-rata participation for its investors – indeed, they have supported follow-on rounds for companies like Aerotravel, VoxiKids, etc. (as per press mentions). This gives existing investors the option to invest more to maintain their stake (though not an obligation). Also, SeedBlink’s secondary market provides a form of risk management by allowing investors to reduce exposure if they choose – for example, if a startup’s outlook worsens, an investor could try to sell some shares (even at a discount) to cut losses or rebalance.
Finally, regulatory compliance is a backbone of their risk management. By being ASF-regulated, they must segregate client funds (investor money doesn’t sit with SeedBlink uncontrolled; typically, it goes through a payment institution or escrow until the round is completed). They also perform AML/KYC checks on investors and companies to prevent fraud. Additionally, ASF’s rules require business continuity plans – ensuring that if SeedBlink ceased operations, nominee-held shares would still be managed or transferred to another entity so investors aren’t orphaned. All these measures contribute to a structured risk management framework. In summary, SeedBlink curates deals stringently, co-invests with lead VCs, fosters investor diversification, and maintains transparency and regulatory compliance to manage the inherent risks of startup investing.
SeedBlink offers a modern, user-friendly web platform with a suite of features that cater to both investors and startup founders. Key functionalities include:
Deal Discovery and Research: Investors can browse active investment opportunities with detailed profiles. Each startup’s page includes the pitch deck, business overview, team info, financial projections, valuation, and the Key Investment Information Sheet outlining risks. Investors can watch live pitch webinars or Q&A sessions with founders for deeper insight. There’s also a “VC Network” directory to see which venture funds are involved, and case studies of past campaigns for learning.
Investor Dashboard (Portfolio Tracking): Once invested, users have access to “myPortfolio,” a personalized dashboard to track all their investments. This tool shows the invested amount, current valuation (if there are follow-on rounds that changed value), and performance metrics. It also stores important documents like shareholder updates, cap table changes, and quarterly reports from each startup. Investors can monitor KPIs and any declared valuation changes (though startups are private, major events like new funding rounds are reflected). Essentially, SeedBlink provides an up-to-date portfolio valuation and document repository, making it easier for investors to manage multiple startup holdings in one place.
Secondary Market: A standout feature is SeedBlink’s secondary market, launched in 2023, which addresses the liquidity issue. It operates as a Bulletin Board where investors can list their shares for sale to other SeedBlink members. Initially restricted to companies funded via SeedBlink (and originally held via SPVs), it enabled early exits in 45+ portfolio companies by Q3 2024. In 2024, they expanded with a new “Secondaries” offering of pre-IPO scale-ups – giving investors access to buy shares in late-stage unicorns like Klarna, Northvolt, Einride, Koenigsegg, Databricks via partnerships. By Oct 2024, the secondary market had facilitated €1.5M in internal trades and €2.2M in external pre-IPO trades. The market is bulletin-board style (not real-time exchange), meaning SeedBlink matches buyers and sellers and manages transaction paperwork. This feature is quite innovative in European crowdfunding, allowing investors to seek early liquidity or to invest in companies that are further along. It’s a key differentiator – for example, by August 2025 the secondary volume surpassed €5M in transactions, showing increasing uptake.
Auto-Invest and Clubs: While SeedBlink does not have a traditional “auto-invest” that automatically allocates funds to deals, it introduced the SeedBlink Club for frequent investors. The SeedBlink Club (a membership program) offers perks like early access to deals, reduced fees, exclusive events and educational resources. Club members likely get notifications or reserved allocations in popular rounds, which can function similarly to auto-invest by ensuring they don’t miss out. Additionally, SeedBlink was developing a “thesis matching” tool that lets investors specify their interests and get matched to suitable deals (personalized deal flow) – this helps investors automate the filtering of deals they want to see.
Community & Education: The platform features a “Circle” community – essentially a forum or social space for investors and founders. Here, members can discuss investment strategies, share insights, and even directly engage with startups. SeedBlink hosts frequent webinars, newsletters, and publishes blog content (e.g., “Funding Academy” guides and Glossary for beginners, expert interviews, and market insights). This community aspect provides a network effect – new investors can learn from more experienced ones. Testimonials from users and case studies are also showcased to build trust.
Cap Table Management for Founders (Equity Management): On the company side, SeedBlink offers a full equity management SaaS (the Nimity platform). Startups that fundraise can use SeedBlink’s tools to manage their cap table, shareholders, ESOP (employee stock option plans), and even conduct follow-on funding rounds privately using the platform’s tech. This is a value-add for companies: instead of juggling spreadsheets, they have a dashboard to track all investors (including those aggregated under the nominee). For investors, this indirectly benefits them as it ensures the startup’s shareholder records are organized and any future changes (new funding rounds, splits, etc.) are properly tracked.
Supported Currencies and Languages: Transactions on SeedBlink are conducted in Euros (€) as the primary currency (nearly all deals are denominated in EUR). The platform interfaces are available in English as the default. Given its Romanian origins, certain content (like help center and some blogs) may be available in Romanian. As they expanded, they may introduce more languages or localized content (for example, some press releases and marketing in Bulgarian, Greek, etc.). However, the investment contracts and information are typically in English to cater to an international audience. Customer support is provided in English and Romanian, and likely also in other local languages via their regional offices for convenience.
Technical UX: Users have to complete KYC verification in-app to activate investing (upload ID, etc.), ensuring compliance. The investing process is online – you pledge an amount, and once the round is closed and contracts signed electronically, you transfer funds (often to an escrow or designated account). All documents are e-signed and stored on the platform. Investors can also enable notifications for new deals or updates. The overall experience is meant to be as seamless as using a brokerage app, but for private startups.
Other Features: SeedBlink provides tools like investment calculators (to model equity dilution, SAFE conversions, etc.), which help investors understand scenarios. They also have an AI-driven Pitch Review tool for founders (which indirectly benefits investors by improving the quality of pitches). No insurance or guarantee products are offered (which is standard for this industry). The platform does not provide personalized investment advice, but through content and the Q&A process, investors receive guidance. For lead investors or investment clubs, “Syndicate” functionality allows someone to use SeedBlink’s infrastructure to pool their network’s money easily – essentially, an angel lead can create a deal room on SeedBlink for their syndicate, and SeedBlink handles all tracking and single-line cap table entry (this is more on the company side, but it’s a feature that attracts more deals and opportunities for the investor community).
In summary, SeedBlink’s platform is quite robust: it combines investment functionalities (deal access, portfolio management, secondary trading) with community and educational resources. It stands out by integrating the full lifecycle of private investing – from initial funding to potential early exit to equity management – all under one digital roof. For retail investors, this means a one-stop shop for venture investing that previously was hard to access. The presence of features like the secondary market and club membership shows SeedBlink’s commitment to providing flexibility and enhancing liquidity in a traditionally illiquid space, all while keeping investors engaged and informed.
Access Fee:
When an investor commits to a deal, SeedBlink charges a one-time access fee proportional to the investment amount. This typically ranges from about 0.5% to 2.5% of the invested amount. The percentage may vary depending on the investment type or size – larger tickets may incur a smaller percentage. This fee is usually charged after the investment contract is signed (at closing of the round).
Example: on a €5,000 investment, an access fee might be around €100 (if 2%). SeedBlink Club members might benefit from reduced access fees as part of their perks.
Annual Management (Nominee) Fee:
Investors also pay an annual management fee up to 1.5% of the invested amount, for up to 5 years. This fee covers the ongoing cost of the nominee structure and administrative support (handling shareholder duties, reporting, etc.). It’s essentially an annual servicing fee. If the startup exits before 5 years, the fees stop at exit; if it goes beyond 5 years, SeedBlink caps this fee after five installments (so investors aren’t paying indefinitely for a long-held position).
Example: if you invested €5,000, you might pay €75 per year (1.5%) for up to 5 years, totaling €375 if the company hasn’t exited by then.
Success Fee (Carried Interest):
SeedBlink’s main upside comes from a carry on profitable exits. They charge a percentage of the investor’s profits when an exit occurs. The exact carry percentage isn’t publicly listed, but it is often around 10–15% of the profit (common in crowdfunding).
Example: if an investor’s €5,000 stake returns €15,000 at exit (a €10,000 profit), and carry is 10%, SeedBlink would take €1,000 of that profit.
This success fee is only charged if the investor makes a profit – if the startup fails or exits at no gain, there’s no success fee. This aligns SeedBlink with investors: the platform only earns this when investors earn. The carry structure effectively makes SeedBlink operate somewhat like a fund manager, incentivized to list quality startups that can exit successfully.
Secondary Market Fees:
If an investor uses the SeedBlink secondary market, there might be nominal fees for facilitating the trade. According to SeedBlink’s help center, there are no additional fees for buyers on the secondary market, and sellers pay standard fees (the carry on any gain, etc.). There could be a small listing fee or transaction fee for selling, but SeedBlink indicated in FAQs that no extra fees beyond the usual carry are taken for secondary transactions. This encourages liquidity by not overcharging secondary trades.
💡 Notably, joining SeedBlink and browsing deals is free – no membership fee is required (except for the optional Club membership which is more of a loyalty program). Investors only start paying fees when they actually invest. This transparent “no win, no heavy fee” approach is designed to lower barriers to entry.
Campaign Setup Fee:
This is a flat fee to cover SeedBlink’s services during the fundraising (legal paperwork, marketing the campaign, compliance). The amount can vary by deal, but it’s likely a modest few thousand euros (possibly waived or reduced for attractive startups). This is paid by the startup upfront or at the time of fundraising. It covers things like preparing the investment documentation, regulatory filings, and promoting the round to SeedBlink’s investor base.
Success Fee (Carry on Exit):
Similar to investors, the startup (or rather, the investors’ profit portion) will involve a carried interest to SeedBlink at exit. The startup agrees that SeedBlink will take a percentage of the profits that investors make (as described above). Effectively, this is not a fee directly out of the startup’s pocket at funding time, but from the exit proceeds distributed to SeedBlink nominee.
This is very advantageous for cash-strapped startups since they don’t lose, say, 5–10% of their raise immediately as a platform fee (as was common in older crowdfunding models). It aligns SeedBlink with long-term success.
Nominee Administration Fee:
The startup may be charged an annual fee for SeedBlink handling communications with all the crowd investors (via the nominee). This could be a nominal amount per year or per investor beyond a threshold.
Example: SeedBlink mentioned €50 per investor beyond the first 15 for the company – implying that if a startup has a lot of small investors, it pays a bit to cover the administrative overhead.
This incentivizes startups to not overload with too many tiny tickets or at least compensates SeedBlink for managing large cap tables. SeedBlink’s nominee essentially shields the startup from having 100+ direct shareholders, but the company still must provide info to those investors via SeedBlink; the fee covers that work.
📌 In summary, startups pay a small setup fee and then no commission on funds raised, but agree to the carry and any admin fees. This model reduces upfront cost for startups raising funds and makes SeedBlink a long-term partner in the company’s journey.
SeedBlink is quite transparent about its fees. The fee schedule is available on their website and help center, and investors see the fees applicable before confirming an investment. For example, during the investment checkout, it will show the access fee percentage and estimated nominee fees, etc.
No hidden fees:
No monthly account fees for investors
No fees to just hold an investment (beyond the annual 1.5% which is clearly disclosed)
No withdrawal fees (money isn’t held like an e-wallet; investors wire funds per deal)
No performance fee if there is no profit (if an exit happens at breakeven or loss, SeedBlink doesn’t take carry)
This is explicitly a “we win when you win” approach.
💡 Traditional equity crowdfunding often charged ~5–7% of funds raised from the company plus sometimes 5% from investors. SeedBlink’s carry model is more like AngelList syndicates or venture funds, which is innovative in the EU crowdfunding space. It likely stems from wanting to attract high-quality startups by not burdening them upfront.
The downside is that SeedBlink’s revenue is more long-term (waiting for exits), so to sustain operations it relies on the smaller access and management fees in the interim.
📌 For investors, remember that platform fees will reduce your gains. For instance, a 10% carry means an investor’s net return is a bit lower than the gross exit multiple. But given the value provided (sourcing deals, managing everything), most find it reasonable.
Overall, the pricing model is transparent and fair, designed to ensure SeedBlink earns mainly when investors and startups succeed. Both sides (investors and founders) share the cost of running the platform, and the costs are clearly communicated. There have been no complaints of hidden charges in the community to date; in fact, experienced investors often cite SeedBlink’s fee structure as being on par or better than other platforms when considering the absence of upfront commissions.
Overall, SeedBlink has maintained a positive reputation in the European startup ecosystem, with few major controversies since its inception. That said, a few negative points and criticisms have surfaced:
In 2025, some individuals complained about receiving unsolicited promotional emails from SeedBlink. On Trustpilot, a couple of 1-star reviews (from users in the Netherlands) claimed “Don’t know how they got my email… at best this is spam,” suggesting SeedBlink may have obtained or used email lists without clear permission. Another user similarly reported “I just received a scam email from them… I have never had dealings with them.”
These comments imply that SeedBlink’s marketing outreach raised concerns for some recipients who weren’t familiar with the platform. SeedBlink did not publicly respond to these Trustpilot reviews (and the company has not replied to some negative reviews, per Trustpilot’s observation). It’s possible SeedBlink engaged in aggressive email marketing or partnerships that led to such emails. This is a minor issue, but it has given a few people a negative first impression (labeling the emails “scam” due to not opting in).
As of mid-2025, SeedBlink’s Trustpilot rating stands at 3.1 out of 5. This is an average score primarily because of the very low number of reviews (only 8 reviews total). Notably, about 62.5% of reviewers gave 5 stars (praising the platform), and 37.5% gave 1 star. The negative reviews were mostly the email spam complaints mentioned and one saying “Not trustworthy. Stay away” with no details.
While the sample size is small, the presence of some dissatisfied voices brings the score down. Traders Union’s analysis noted that the small number of reviews limits its usefulness, and that a significant portion being negative could indicate some service issues or user expectations not met. However, it’s important to highlight that many investors actively using SeedBlink might not leave Trustpilot reviews at all (the platform isn’t as consumer-facing as an e-commerce site). Still, prospective users seeing a 3-star Trustpilot might pause – SeedBlink will need to encourage more happy users to share feedback to improve this.
Some informal criticisms revolve around the inherent nature of the investments: investors have to wait a long time with no guarantee of exit. On forums like Reddit and local discussions, a few users have pointed out that while SeedBlink touts successes, the majority of investments are still illiquid and it’s unclear how many will actually pay off.
This isn’t so much a scandal as a reality check: e.g., one Reddit user noted that most companies listed are Romanian and one must be patient (comparing to other platforms). Opportunity cost has been cited – during 2022–2023, some Romanian investors reportedly shifted focus from startup investing to high-yield government bonds (which were offering ~8% risk-free). Andrei Dudoiu himself acknowledged in a 2025 interview that some investors “migrated” to safer investments given macro conditions.
While not a criticism of SeedBlink per se, it does reflect that the platform’s offerings can fall out of favor when safer alternatives boom, leading some to describe startup investing as not worth the risk in such times.
By nature of the business, some funded startups will fail or face problems. To date, there haven’t been high-profile failure scandals directly tied to SeedBlink (no known frauds or founder misconduct cases reported publicly).
However, if a notable startup funded on SeedBlink were to collapse in a controversial way, that could attract negative publicity. Investors have to sign risk acknowledgments, so legally SeedBlink would not be at fault, but reputationally it could sting. As of 2025, no such incident has made news. On the contrary, we’ve seen some positive news (like an exit). SeedBlink likely proactively manages communications if a startup is clearly failing, to keep investors informed and avoid surprise backlash.
There have been no warnings or sanctions issued against SeedBlink by regulators. In fact, ASF (the regulator) has been supportive, issuing press releases praising the authorization of SeedBlink and development of crowdfunding.
The only adjacent negative mention was ASF warning the public in 2023 about unauthorized scam entities falsely using names similar to crowdfunding; SeedBlink itself was not implicated, but ASF listed only SeedBlink as authorized, implying anything else in RO was suspect.
SeedBlink’s proper licensing likely shields it from regulatory criticism. However, as with any platform, if it were to have a cybersecurity breach or fail to comply with investor protection rules, that would be a serious issue – but again, no such problems have been reported.
Media coverage of SeedBlink has been mostly positive or neutral – focusing on its expansion, product launches, and the fact it’s pioneering regional crowdfunding.
A few blogs have done deep dives and posed the question “Is SeedBlink safe and legit?”; for example, an August 2025 review by TradersUnion concluded that while user reviews are mixed, the platform overall appears legitimate and growing. They did highlight that SeedBlink doesn’t respond to negative reviews and that a significant chunk of the few reviews are negative, which “could indicate systemic issues” – but they also immediately caveat that the sample size is too small to judge.
Essentially, the only slight tarnish is that SeedBlink hasn’t yet built a public track record of many investor success stories, so skeptics point that out.
Some users compare SeedBlink with Western platforms like Seedrs or Crowdcube and note differences: e.g., SeedBlink’s minimum ticket (€2.5k) is higher than some UK platforms (which allow £10 or £100 investments), which drew a bit of criticism that it’s not as accessible to small retail investors. SeedBlink’s reasoning is likely to ensure a certain investor caliber and keep cap tables manageable, but still, this is a point raised in discussions.
Others have noted that SeedBlink deals historically were Romania/CEE-heavy (though this is changing), which might concentrate risk regionally.
✅ In conclusion: There is no major “scandal” or negative event on SeedBlink’s record to date (no fraud, no platform failure, etc.). The negative publicity it has encountered is relatively minor: a lukewarm Trustpilot rating influenced by a few spam complaints and the general awareness that startup investing is risky and long-term.
SeedBlink will need to continue building trust by showcasing actual results (exits) and maintaining transparent communication. It would also benefit from addressing the unsolicited email issue – ensuring its marketing is opt-in to avoid turning off potential users.
For now, the platform’s reputation in the startup community remains largely positive, seen as an innovative player enabling tech funding, with the “negative publicity” mostly confined to a few online comments and the inherent challenges of the asset class.
Despite being a young platform, SeedBlink has notched several notable success stories and milestones that demonstrate its impact:
In mid-2022, SeedBlink celebrated the first successful exit of a portfolio company. SanoPass, a Romanian health-tech startup offering medical subscriptions, was acquired by MedLife (the largest private healthcare network in Romania).
SanoPass had raised funding on SeedBlink twice (in 2020 and 2021) and grew its business, leading to the acquisition approx. 2.5 years after the initial SeedBlink investment. This exit provided an early return to over 50 SeedBlink investors. While the exact return multiple wasn’t publicly disclosed, investor testimonials indicated a positive ROI and praised SeedBlink’s smooth handling of the exit process.
This was a pivotal milestone – as one investor put it, “the first profit made was the moment I had been waiting for… this event paves the way for many more investment successes.” SeedBlink proving an exit case boosted confidence that these investments can indeed yield returns.
FlowX.ai, a Romanian enterprise software startup, had one of SeedBlink’s largest campaigns and has become a poster child for success in progress. SeedBlink contributed €1.6 million in FlowX’s round in 2021 (the round totaled €7.3M).
This was at the time a record crowdfunding amount in CEE. Since then, FlowX.ai has gained significant traction – in 2023, it was named in Gartner’s Market Guide for Digital Banking Platforms (a mark of industry recognition). The company is scaling globally. While not exited yet, its valuation has likely increased with each new institutional round, meaning SeedBlink investors are sitting on substantial unrealized gains. It’s a success story of helping a local startup get global attention.
Dronamics, a Bulgaria-based cargo drone startup, raised €950K via SeedBlink in 2021. This helped them continue development and expand.
In 2022, Dronamics won a $40M EU grant and prepared for launching unmanned cargo flights in Europe. By 2023, Dronamics was granted the first drone airline license in Europe, a major achievement, and has since raised further funding (Series A) at higher valuations. SeedBlink investors not only potentially see their shares value rise, but Dronamics’ campaign also helped the company cement a presence in Romania (as they noted SeedBlink brought them many Romanian angel supporters and exposure).
This cross-border success underscores SeedBlink’s role in connecting regional startups with a wider investor base.
In May 2021, SeedBlink did something novel – it crowdfunded itself. The platform opened an offering to its users to invest in SeedBlink’s parent company. The target was €1.1M, and it sold out rapidly (in fact, it was oversubscribed, reaching €1.1M in 17 minutes).
Combined with VC investment, SeedBlink raised €3M (Series A). This campaign was the largest equity crowdfunding round in Romania at that time. It’s a success story in that it demonstrated the power of the platform (people investing in the very platform they use).
It also aligned SeedBlink with its community – those investors share in SeedBlink’s growth. The round’s success earned media coverage and proved that significant capital could be mobilized quickly through the platform.
In early 2023, SeedBlink acquired Symbid, a Netherlands-based crowdfunding pioneer (active since 2011). This was a major strategic move, marking the first cross-border M&A among European crowdfunding platforms.
Through this, SeedBlink gained Symbid’s community of investors and portfolio of Dutch deals, instantly expanding its footprint in Western Europe. It also signaled SeedBlink’s ambition to be a pan-European leader. The acquisition was lauded in press as SeedBlink “joining forces” with an industry veteran.
This success was not about a startup exit but about SeedBlink’s corporate milestone – positioning it to accelerate growth into Benelux and beyond.
SeedBlink’s authorization as the first licensed crowdfunding platform in Romania (Nov 2022) was itself a success story from a regulatory standpoint. ASF publicly announced it and highlighted it as pioneering for the local capital market.
This gave SeedBlink an EU passport, essentially certifying it as a trustworthy player. Gaining this license well ahead of many competitors (some platforms across Europe struggled to meet the new regulations by the 2023 deadline) meant SeedBlink could continue operations seamlessly.
By early 2023, it was one of only ~30 platforms Europe-wide to be fully authorized under ECSPR, which was a badge of credibility to larger partners and investors.
SeedBlink has formed notable partnerships that validate its model. For example, in 2022 it partnered with Microsoft’s Founders Hub to provide fundraising education, and with major Romanian bank Banca Transilvania for reaching more entrepreneurs (the CEO of BT has praised SeedBlink in interviews).
In 2023, Equidam (startup valuation platform) partnered with SeedBlink to offer valuation tools to startups. Such collaborations show industry recognition. SeedBlink was also a winner of the “Best Fintech Startup” in some local Romanian startup awards early on (2020/2021).
Moreover, it was covered by EU-Startups.com, Sifted, and other tech outlets as a rising star in the crowd investment space.
The platform highlights many positive testimonials (success stories) from both founders and investors.
For instance, founders like those of Workathlon (UK/GR startup) and easySales (RO startup) have publicly stated that using SeedBlink not only brought funding but also a network of supportive angels in new markets. easySales crowdfunded its entire round on SeedBlink and called it aligned with their mission.
Investors like Daniel Mereuță, one of the first users, became what SeedBlink calls a “Champion Investor” and has given interviews about how SeedBlink allowed him to build a diverse startup portfolio and learn along the way. These individual success anecdotes reinforce the brand.
In four years, SeedBlink grew from an idea to a platform that mobilized over €340M and €815M+ in assets under custody. It expanded to 20+ tech verticals funded and multiple countries.
In 2023, it launched products like Nimity (Equity Management) and SeedBlink Club, showcasing continuous innovation. These milestones were highlighted in their January 2024 annual report and press release, which framed SeedBlink as Europe’s tech investment infrastructure provider, not just a crowdfunding site.
Being able to make these claims in a short time is a success in itself.
✅ In summary: SeedBlink’s success stories span both startup outcomes and its own corporate achievements. The SanoPass exit stands as proof of concept that investors can realize gains.
The mega-rounds like FlowX and Dronamics show that SeedBlink can participate in significant deals, helping startups on the path to becoming “the next European superstars” (as SeedBlink touted in 2023).
Acquiring Symbid and expanding offices to 6 countries by 2024 indicates the platform’s growth strategy bearing fruit.
As more exits hopefully occur in coming years, we can expect to hear more concrete ROI success stories (e.g., if a portfolio company IPOs or is bought for a big multiple). For now, the momentum and early wins are strong indicators that SeedBlink is succeeding in its mission to democratize tech investing in Europe.
Yes, SeedBlink is a legitimate, regulated platform. It is authorized by the Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority (ASF) as of Nov 3, 2022, and holds an EU Crowdfunding Service Provider license (passportable across all EU countries).
This means it meets strict regulations on transparency, investor protection, and operational standards. Investors’ funds are handled through secure, segregated accounts during transactions, and the platform implements KYC (Know Your Customer) and anti-fraud measures.
While no investment is ever “safe” (startups are high risk), the platform itself is trustworthy and monitored by regulators, not a scam. SeedBlink has been operating since 2020 with no security breaches reported and is backed by reputable VCs.
It uses a nominee structure to hold shares on investors’ behalf, which is a standard, secure practice to manage equity stakes.
However, note that investments on SeedBlink are not covered by any deposit insurance or investor compensation scheme – your money is at risk in the ventures you invest in.
✅ Overall, SeedBlink provides a safe investing infrastructure and is fully legit and regulated — but investors must still conduct due diligence on each deal and invest responsibly.
Returns vary widely and are highly uncertain – startup investing is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor. There is no fixed “interest” or guaranteed return.
In the best-case scenario, if a startup you invest in grows rapidly and gets acquired or goes public, you could see multiples of your investment (e.g. 5×, 10× or more over several years). For instance, some investors who sold shares on SeedBlink’s secondary market in successful startups achieved 2.5× to 3× returns in ~2 years. The platform’s first exit (SanoPass in 2022) delivered a profitable return (exact multiple undisclosed, but investors did make money).
However, many investments will yield 0 – if a startup fails, you lose your money. It’s common that out of a portfolio, a few winners produce most of the returns while others produce losses (the “power law”). You should mentally prepare for the possibility of total loss on any given startup, and understand that realized returns (if any) typically come after 4–7+ years when an exit happens.
SeedBlink itself reports that some of its top portfolio companies have increased in value (on paper) – e.g., FlowX.ai raised follow-on funding at a higher valuation – but until they exit, that’s not cash in hand.
💡 Bottom line: You could see high returns if the startups succeed (e.g., a €5K investment turning into €50K on a big exit), but you could also lose the entire investment. A balanced expectation for a diversified portfolio might be an overall IRR in the teens or higher if a few hits occur, but there are no guarantees. It’s wise to invest in multiple companies to increase the chance that one big success offsets the failures.
The main risks are inherent to startup investing, which include:
💀 High risk of failure: Startups are risky – a significant percentage will fail outright, meaning you could lose 100% of those investments. Unlike bonds or established stocks, there’s no safety net. Total loss of capital is a real possibility on any deal.
🔒 Illiquidity: You typically cannot sell or cash out easily (no guaranteed secondary market). You’re locked in until an exit which might never come, or could take many years. So your money is tied up and not accessible for other uses, and there’s no interest or dividends in the interim (usually).
⚠️ No guarantees or protection: There is no guarantee of returns, and no external insurance. These investments are not covered by deposit insurance or investor compensation schemes. If the startup fails, you have no recourse to recover funds.
📉 Valuation and dilution risk: The valuation at which you invest could be too high (overvalued startups may not grow into that valuation, leading to “down rounds” or low exit multiples). Additionally, if the startup raises more money later, new investors might dilute your ownership. While you still hold the same number of shares, your percentage can drop, and if you can’t follow on (invest more) to maintain your stake, your influence and upside might diminish.
📊 Economic and market risk: These are private, often early-stage companies sensitive to economic downturns. If the tech market or economy struggles (like in 2022 when VC funding dipped), startups may fail to raise follow-on funding and could go under. Also, broad market conditions affect exit opportunities (IPOs dry up in bad markets, acquisitions might slow down).
⚙️ Execution risk: Even with great ideas, startups face execution challenges – management mistakes, technical hurdles, competition, regulatory changes can all derail a company. As an investor, you’re mostly hands-off, so you rely entirely on the founders to deliver. If they pivot or the business model changes, your investment risk profile can change too.
⏳ Liquidity timing risk: Even successful startups might take a long time to exit. Your IRR (annual return) can be affected by how long it takes. A 5x return over 10 years is a decent outcome, but it’s roughly ~17% IRR; that same 5x in 3 years is a spectacular ~71% IRR. You don’t control timing – a company could do well but remain private for 15 years (some unicorns stay private very long).
🏛️ Platform risk: While SeedBlink is regulated and has measures in place, there’s some risk related to the platform itself. For example, if SeedBlink as a company had financial difficulties or shut down (unlikely short-term, but a consideration), there could be administrative headaches in transferring nominee management to another provider. However, since shares are held in your name via the nominee, you should still legally own your stakes. Platform risk also includes possible technical glitches or cyber attacks (though none known so far) – any online platform has that inherent risk, albeit mitigated by security protocols.
🙅 Lack of control: As a minority investor through SeedBlink, you won’t have control or maybe even voting rights in the startup (often shares held via nominee are non-voting or you give proxy to lead investor). You can’t influence the company’s direction. If things go wrong, you are a passive bystander.
📩 Information risk: Private companies aren’t required to provide the same level of detailed regular disclosures as public companies. While SeedBlink mandates quarterly updates, the info is as good as the founders provide. There may be gaps or delays in reporting. You might not know immediately if a company is struggling until a formal update or news breaks.
💱 Foreign exchange risk: A smaller consideration – investments are in EUR. If your home currency is different (e.g., RON, GBP), currency fluctuations could affect your effective return when converting back. However, since most exits would also likely be valued in EUR or USD, this is minor compared to the other risks.
💡 In essence: the main risk is that you might lose money or see it locked up for a long time without return. To manage these risks, diversify (don’t put too much in one startup or even in this asset class overall), invest only money you can afford to have illiquid, and do your homework on each opportunity.
SeedBlink helps by curating deals and requiring lead investors, which filters out some riskier propositions. They also provide educational resources about the high-risk nature. But ultimately, invest with the mindset that you could lose it all, and if that outcome is something you can financially and emotionally handle, then the potential high rewards of one or two big successes might make it worthwhile.
This platform have no rating yet. Be the first to rate!